Kiribati vs Samoa: Net ODA received
Net ODA received over time
- Kiribati
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 42.0% against 40.3% in Kiribati, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Samoa ahead.
Kiribati ranks 22nd and Samoa ranks 21st of 119 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 53.7% | 48.2% | 5.6% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 36.6% | 45.3% | 8.7% | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Kiribati or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 42.0% against 40.3% in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Kiribati and Samoa?
- 1.7%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for net oda received?
- Kiribati ranks 22nd and Samoa ranks 21st of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net ODA received (% of central government expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official development assistance (ODA) consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by official agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent).