Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Uzbekistan: Net ODA received
Net ODA received over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 5.7% against 5.0% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 67th and Uzbekistan ranks 70th of 119 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Uzbekistan?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 5.7% against 5.0% in Uzbekistan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net oda received between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uzbekistan?
- 0.7%, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uzbekistan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2017.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uzbekistan rank globally for net oda received?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 67th and Uzbekistan ranks 70th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net ODA received (% of central government expense). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official development assistance (ODA) consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by official agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent).