China vs Hong Kong: Net ODA received (% of gross capital formation)
Net ODA received (% of gross capital formation) over time
- China
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.0% against -0.0% in China, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 7.3 times China's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Hong Kong ahead.
China ranks 142nd and Hong Kong ranks 140th of 146 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | Hong Kong |
| 1980s | 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.8% | China |
| 1990s | 1.4% | 0.1% | 1.3% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net oda received, China or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 0.0% against -0.0% in China as of 1996.
- What is the difference in net oda received between China and Hong Kong?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Hong Kong?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 1996.
- How do China and Hong Kong rank globally for net oda received?
- China ranks 142nd and Hong Kong ranks 140th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net ODA received (% of gross capital formation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official development assistance (ODA) consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by official agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent).