Bhutan vs Mozambique: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Bhutan
4,112 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
3,723 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
86th
Mozambique rank
89th

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Bhutan
  • Mozambique
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 4,112 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,723 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 389 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1963 it was Mozambique ahead.

Bhutan ranks 86th and Mozambique ranks 89th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Mozambique in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre 5.31 current US$ per square kilometre 4.17 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1970s 38.46 current US$ per square kilometre 53.3 current US$ per square kilometre 14.84 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 481.3 current US$ per square kilometre 518.28 current US$ per square kilometre 36.98 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 1,398 current US$ per square kilometre 1,355 current US$ per square kilometre 43.18 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 1,952 current US$ per square kilometre 1,921 current US$ per square kilometre 31.29 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 3,122 current US$ per square kilometre 2,436 current US$ per square kilometre 685.69 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 4,484 current US$ per square kilometre 3,289 current US$ per square kilometre 1,195 current US$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Bhutan or Mozambique?
Bhutan, at 4,112 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,723 current US$ per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Bhutan and Mozambique?
389 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mozambique?
60 years are reported by both, from 1963 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Mozambique rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Bhutan ranks 86th and Mozambique ranks 89th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Mozambique: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/mozambique/">Bhutan vs Mozambique: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.