Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Bosnia and Herzegovina
6,010 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
6,420 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
72nd
Eswatini rank
70th

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Eswatini
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 6,420 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,010 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 410 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 72nd and Eswatini ranks 70th of 168 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 13,123 current US$ per square kilometre 2,553 current US$ per square kilometre 10,570 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 11,172 current US$ per square kilometre 2,201 current US$ per square kilometre 8,971 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 9,410 current US$ per square kilometre 6,329 current US$ per square kilometre 3,081 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 7,804 current US$ per square kilometre 6,404 current US$ per square kilometre 1,400 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 6,420 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,010 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
410 current US$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eswatini rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 72nd and Eswatini ranks 70th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/eswatini/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eswatini: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.