Botswana vs Egypt: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Botswana
502.15 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt
482.26 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
134th
Egypt rank
135th

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Botswana
  • Egypt
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 502.15 current US$ per square kilometre against 482.26 current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 19.89 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Botswana ranks 134th and Egypt ranks 135th of 169 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Egypt Difference Ahead
1960s 19.89 current US$ per square kilometre 115.73 current US$ per square kilometre 95.84 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 79.32 current US$ per square kilometre 1,464 current US$ per square kilometre 1,384 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 205.88 current US$ per square kilometre 1,574 current US$ per square kilometre 1,368 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 186.26 current US$ per square kilometre 3,035 current US$ per square kilometre 2,849 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2000s 246.49 current US$ per square kilometre 1,232 current US$ per square kilometre 985.65 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 170.01 current US$ per square kilometre 2,072 current US$ per square kilometre 1,902 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2020s 244.04 current US$ per square kilometre 4,007 current US$ per square kilometre 3,763 current US$ per square kilometre Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Botswana or Egypt?
Botswana, at 502.15 current US$ per square kilometre against 482.26 current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Botswana and Egypt?
19.89 current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Egypt?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Egypt rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Botswana ranks 134th and Egypt ranks 135th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Egypt: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/egypt-arab-rep/">Botswana vs Egypt: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.