Cuba vs Morocco: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Cuba
1,610 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
1,729 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
113th
Morocco rank
112th

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Cuba
  • Morocco
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 1,729 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,610 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 119 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Morocco ahead.

Cuba ranks 113th and Morocco ranks 112th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre 205.21 current US$ per square kilometre 200.55 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 218.25 current US$ per square kilometre 587.49 current US$ per square kilometre 369.24 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1980s 401.41 current US$ per square kilometre 1,466 current US$ per square kilometre 1,065 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 493.8 current US$ per square kilometre 1,798 current US$ per square kilometre 1,304 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 792.95 current US$ per square kilometre 1,843 current US$ per square kilometre 1,050 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 5,669 current US$ per square kilometre 3,520 current US$ per square kilometre 2,148 current US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 2,382 current US$ per square kilometre 2,808 current US$ per square kilometre 426.19 current US$ per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Cuba or Morocco?
Morocco, at 1,729 current US$ per square kilometre against 1,610 current US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Cuba and Morocco?
119 current US$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Morocco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Morocco rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Cuba ranks 113th and Morocco ranks 112th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Morocco: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/morocco/">Cuba vs Morocco: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.