Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Eswatini
6,420 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
6,718 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
70th
Guinea-Bissau rank
69th

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea-Bissau
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 6,718 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,420 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 298 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 70th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 69th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Guinea-Bissau in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 601.45 current US$ per square kilometre 37.34 current US$ per square kilometre 564.11 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 1,264 current US$ per square kilometre 875.62 current US$ per square kilometre 388.55 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 1,973 current US$ per square kilometre 2,686 current US$ per square kilometre 713.08 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 2,662 current US$ per square kilometre 4,221 current US$ per square kilometre 1,559 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 2,201 current US$ per square kilometre 3,522 current US$ per square kilometre 1,322 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 6,329 current US$ per square kilometre 4,293 current US$ per square kilometre 2,036 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 6,404 current US$ per square kilometre 5,850 current US$ per square kilometre 554.37 current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 6,718 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,420 current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
298 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Eswatini ranks 70th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 69th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guinea-bissau/">Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.