Gambia vs Jordan: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Gambia
33,978 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
31,919 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
31st
Jordan rank
33rd

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Gambia
  • Jordan
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 33,978 current US$ per square kilometre against 31,919 current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 2,059 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Gambia ranks 31st and Jordan ranks 33rd of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 351.45 current US$ per square kilometre 787.44 current US$ per square kilometre 435.99 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 1,334 current US$ per square kilometre 4,771 current US$ per square kilometre 3,437 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 6,847 current US$ per square kilometre 9,050 current US$ per square kilometre 2,203 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 6,459 current US$ per square kilometre 6,091 current US$ per square kilometre 367.21 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 7,356 current US$ per square kilometre 7,795 current US$ per square kilometre 438.55 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 14,911 current US$ per square kilometre 22,726 current US$ per square kilometre 7,815 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 28,838 current US$ per square kilometre 32,022 current US$ per square kilometre 3,184 current US$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Gambia or Jordan?
Gambia, at 33,978 current US$ per square kilometre against 31,919 current US$ per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Gambia and Jordan?
2,059 current US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Jordan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Jordan rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Gambia ranks 31st and Jordan ranks 33rd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Jordan: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/jordan/">Gambia vs Jordan: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.