Gibraltar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Gibraltar
3,000 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Tanzania, United Republic of
3,451 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gibraltar rank
92nd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
91st

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 3,451 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Gibraltar, a difference of 451 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Gibraltar's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gibraltar ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 92nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 91st of 169 countries.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 107,222 current US$ per square kilometre 44.5 current US$ per square kilometre 107,178 current US$ per square kilometre Gibraltar
1970s 440,200 current US$ per square kilometre 264.49 current US$ per square kilometre 439,936 current US$ per square kilometre Gibraltar
1980s 1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre 805.5 current US$ per square kilometre 1.17 million current US$ per square kilometre Gibraltar
1990s 74,200 current US$ per square kilometre 1,146 current US$ per square kilometre 73,054 current US$ per square kilometre Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Gibraltar or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 3,451 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,000 current US$ per square kilometre in Gibraltar as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Gibraltar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
451 current US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Tanzania, United Republic of?
39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
How do Gibraltar and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Gibraltar ranks 92nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 91st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gibraltar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/gibraltar/tanzania/">Gibraltar vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.