Jamaica vs Tunisia: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Jamaica
7,979 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
7,891 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
60th
Tunisia rank
61st

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Jamaica
  • Tunisia
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 7,979 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,891 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 88 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 60th and Tunisia ranks 61st of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 916.38 current US$ per square kilometre 550.28 current US$ per square kilometre 366.1 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 3,461 current US$ per square kilometre 1,185 current US$ per square kilometre 2,277 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 15,617 current US$ per square kilometre 1,493 current US$ per square kilometre 14,124 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 9,638 current US$ per square kilometre 1,471 current US$ per square kilometre 8,166 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 5,144 current US$ per square kilometre 2,218 current US$ per square kilometre 2,926 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 6,950 current US$ per square kilometre 5,065 current US$ per square kilometre 1,885 current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 7,175 current US$ per square kilometre 7,272 current US$ per square kilometre 96.18 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Jamaica or Tunisia?
Jamaica, at 7,979 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,891 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Jamaica and Tunisia?
88 current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Tunisia rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Jamaica ranks 60th and Tunisia ranks 61st of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Tunisia: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/tunisia/">Jamaica vs Tunisia: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.