Lesotho vs Liberia: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Lesotho
5,676 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
5,841 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Lesotho rank
74th
Liberia rank
73rd

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Lesotho
  • Liberia
05.0k10.0k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 5,841 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,676 current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho, a difference of 165 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Lesotho ranks 74th and Liberia ranks 73rd of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 3 and Liberia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 305.34 current US$ per square kilometre 331.55 current US$ per square kilometre 26.21 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
1970s 930.43 current US$ per square kilometre 279.71 current US$ per square kilometre 650.72 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1980s 3,357 current US$ per square kilometre 987.43 current US$ per square kilometre 2,370 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
1990s 3,508 current US$ per square kilometre 1,157 current US$ per square kilometre 2,352 current US$ per square kilometre Lesotho
2000s 2,904 current US$ per square kilometre 3,995 current US$ per square kilometre 1,091 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2010s 5,989 current US$ per square kilometre 8,002 current US$ per square kilometre 2,013 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 5,586 current US$ per square kilometre 5,995 current US$ per square kilometre 408.58 current US$ per square kilometre Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Lesotho or Liberia?
Liberia, at 5,841 current US$ per square kilometre against 5,676 current US$ per square kilometre in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Lesotho and Liberia?
165 current US$ per square kilometre, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Liberia rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Lesotho ranks 74th and Liberia ranks 73rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Liberia: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/lesotho/liberia/">Lesotho vs Liberia: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.