Mauritania vs Namibia: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Mauritania
407 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
329.94 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
140th
Namibia rank
141st

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 407 current US$ per square kilometre against 329.94 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 77.06 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 141st of 169 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 12.95 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0243 current US$ per square kilometre 12.93 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 201.38 current US$ per square kilometre 23.69 current US$ per square kilometre 177.7 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 231.89 current US$ per square kilometre 198.35 current US$ per square kilometre 33.54 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 282.35 current US$ per square kilometre 211.45 current US$ per square kilometre 70.9 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 333.31 current US$ per square kilometre 252.79 current US$ per square kilometre 80.52 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 447.95 current US$ per square kilometre 292.56 current US$ per square kilometre 155.39 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Mauritania or Namibia?
Mauritania, at 407 current US$ per square kilometre against 329.94 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Mauritania and Namibia?
77.06 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
41 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Mauritania ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 141st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.