Mauritius vs Rwanda: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Mauritius
47,502 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
56,236 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
24th
Rwanda rank
21st

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Mauritius
  • Rwanda
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 56,236 current US$ per square kilometre against 47,502 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 8,734 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 169 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 2,438 current US$ per square kilometre 447.87 current US$ per square kilometre 1,990 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 10,253 current US$ per square kilometre 2,829 current US$ per square kilometre 7,424 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 23,327 current US$ per square kilometre 7,541 current US$ per square kilometre 15,786 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 20,262 current US$ per square kilometre 16,922 current US$ per square kilometre 3,340 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 23,232 current US$ per square kilometre 22,865 current US$ per square kilometre 367.44 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 45,285 current US$ per square kilometre 44,205 current US$ per square kilometre 1,080 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 100,666 current US$ per square kilometre 54,932 current US$ per square kilometre 45,735 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Mauritius or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 56,236 current US$ per square kilometre against 47,502 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Mauritius and Rwanda?
8,734 current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Rwanda rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Mauritius ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 21st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Rwanda: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/rwanda/">Mauritius vs Rwanda: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.