Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per

Türkiye
2,014 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2,046 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Türkiye rank
106th
Zimbabwe rank
105th

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per over time

  • Türkiye
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2,046 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,014 current US$ per square kilometre in Türkiye, a difference of 32 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Türkiye ahead.

Türkiye ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Türkiye averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Türkiye Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 245.23 current US$ per square kilometre 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre 237.9 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye
1970s 231.48 current US$ per square kilometre 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre 220.32 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye
1980s 552.15 current US$ per square kilometre 603.19 current US$ per square kilometre 51.04 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 587.71 current US$ per square kilometre 1,106 current US$ per square kilometre 518.58 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 705.5 current US$ per square kilometre 875.57 current US$ per square kilometre 170.07 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 3,189 current US$ per square kilometre 2,025 current US$ per square kilometre 1,163 current US$ per square kilometre Türkiye
2020s 1,285 current US$ per square kilometre 2,296 current US$ per square kilometre 1,011 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per, Türkiye or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2,046 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,014 current US$ per square kilometre in Türkiye as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per between Türkiye and Zimbabwe?
32 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Türkiye and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Türkiye and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per?
Türkiye ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 105th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turkiye/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turkiye/zimbabwe/">Türkiye vs Zimbabwe: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,179 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.