Early-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit

Early-demographic dividend
0.0053 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Rwanda
0.0937 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend rank
24th
Rwanda rank
27th

Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
00.20.40.60.81196019912023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.0937 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0053 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0884 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 17.8 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 52 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 44 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0125 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1297 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1172 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1980s 0.0106 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1057 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0951 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
1990s 0.009 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2943 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2853 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2000s 0.0048 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1781 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1733 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2010s 0.0044 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.134 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1296 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0.0056 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1367 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1311 current US$ per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per unit, Early-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.0937 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0053 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per unit between Early-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
0.0884 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per unit?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 24th and Rwanda ranks 27th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-development-assistance-received-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/early-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Early-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 10,652 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.