IDA blend vs South Sudan: Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit
IDA blend
0.0111 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2021
South Sudan
0.1396 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2015
IDA blend rank
19th
South Sudan rank
18th
Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit over time
- IDA blend
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.1396 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0111 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA blend, a difference of 0.1285 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 12.6 times IDA blend's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
IDA blend ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 44 groups.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official development assistance received (current us$), per unit, IDA blend or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.1396 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0111 current US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA blend as of 2015.
- What is the difference in net official development assistance received (current us$), per unit between IDA blend and South Sudan?
- 0.1285 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and South Sudan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do IDA blend and South Sudan rank globally for net official development assistance received (current us$), per unit?
- IDA blend ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official development assistance received (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official development assistance received (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.