Azerbaijan vs China (People’s Republic of): Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO

Azerbaijan
512,187 current US$
in 2023
China (People’s Republic of)
487,423 current US$
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
47th
China (People’s Republic of) rank
49th

Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • China (People’s Republic of)
200.0k400.0k600.0k201320182023

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 512,187 current US$ against 487,423 current US$ in China (People’s Republic of), a difference of 24,764 current US$.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times China (People’s Republic of)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 47th and China (People’s Republic of) ranks 49th of 132 countries.

China (People’s Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan China (People’s Republic of) Difference Ahead
2010s 405,796 current US$ 418,528 current US$ 12,731 current US$ China (People’s Republic of)
2020s 315,839 current US$ 488,681 current US$ 172,842 current US$ China (People’s Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, fao, Azerbaijan or China (People’s Republic of)?
Azerbaijan, at 512,187 current US$ against 487,423 current US$ in China (People’s Republic of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, fao between Azerbaijan and China (People’s Republic of)?
24,764 current US$, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and China (People’s Republic of)?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and China (People’s Republic of) rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, fao?
Azerbaijan ranks 47th and China (People’s Republic of) ranks 49th of 132 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs China (People’s Republic of): Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-fao-current-us/azerbaijan/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-fao-current-us/azerbaijan/china/">Azerbaijan vs China (People’s Republic of): Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
174 places, 1,253 data points, 2013–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.