China (People’s Republic of) vs Philippines: Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO

China (People’s Republic of)
487,423 current US$
in 2023
Philippines
467,535 current US$
in 2023
China (People’s Republic of) rank
49th
Philippines rank
52nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO over time

  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Philippines
0500.0k1.0M1.5M201320182023

How they compare

China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 487,423 current US$ against 467,535 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 19,888 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Philippines ahead.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 49th and Philippines ranks 52nd of 132 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China (People’s Republic of) averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China (People’s Republic of) Philippines Difference Ahead
2010s 418,528 current US$ 948,893 current US$ 530,365 current US$ Philippines
2020s 488,681 current US$ 480,876 current US$ 7,805 current US$ China (People’s Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, fao, China (People’s Republic of) or Philippines?
China (People’s Republic of), at 487,423 current US$ against 467,535 current US$ in Philippines as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, fao between China (People’s Republic of) and Philippines?
19,888 current US$, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Philippines?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and Philippines rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, fao?
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 49th and Philippines ranks 52nd of 132 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs Philippines: Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-fao-current-us/china/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-fao-current-us/china/philippines/">China (People’s Republic of) vs Philippines: Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
174 places, 1,253 data points, 2013–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.