Belarus vs Uzbekistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA

Belarus
488,673 current US$
in 2023
Uzbekistan
526,859 current US$
in 2023
Belarus rank
46th
Uzbekistan rank
43rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA over time

  • Belarus
  • Uzbekistan
0500.0k1.0M1.5M200620142023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 526,859 current US$ against 488,673 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 38,186 current US$.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 46th and Uzbekistan ranks 43rd of 112 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 577,500 current US$ 380,000 current US$ 197,500 current US$ Belarus
2010s 520,261 current US$ 773,592 current US$ 253,331 current US$ Uzbekistan
2020s 348,668 current US$ 817,366 current US$ 468,698 current US$ Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, iaea, Belarus or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 526,859 current US$ against 488,673 current US$ in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, iaea between Belarus and Uzbekistan?
38,186 current US$, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uzbekistan?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Uzbekistan rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, iaea?
Belarus ranks 46th and Uzbekistan ranks 43rd of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Uzbekistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-iaea-current-us/belarus/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-iaea-current-us/belarus/uzbekistan/">Belarus vs Uzbekistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
158 places, 2,580 data points, 2006–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.