Central Europe and the Baltics vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA

Central Europe and the Baltics
370,000 current US$
in 2010
Namibia
487,517 current US$
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
44th
Namibia rank
47th

Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Namibia
200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k700.0k200620142023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 487,517 current US$ against 370,000 current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 117,517 current US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 47th of 45 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 427,500 current US$ 372,500 current US$ 55,000 current US$ Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s 370,000 current US$ 430,000 current US$ 60,000 current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, iaea, Central Europe and the Baltics or Namibia?
Namibia, at 487,517 current US$ against 370,000 current US$ in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, iaea between Central Europe and the Baltics and Namibia?
117,517 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Namibia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Namibia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, iaea?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 44th and Namibia ranks 47th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-iaea-current-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-iaea-current-us/central-europe-and-the-baltics/namibia/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
158 places, 2,580 data points, 2006–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies are United Nations includes the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.