Bhutan vs Montenegro: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Bhutan
- Montenegro
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 115,660 current US$ against 102,240 current US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 13,420 current US$.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Montenegro ahead.
Bhutan ranks 65th and Montenegro ranks 66th of 121 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.27 million current US$ | 1.52 million current US$ | 254,610 current US$ | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 1.60 million current US$ | 568,980 current US$ | 1.03 million current US$ | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled, Bhutan or Montenegro?
- Bhutan, at 115,660 current US$ against 102,240 current US$ in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled between Bhutan and Montenegro?
- 13,420 current US$, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Bhutan and Montenegro rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled?
- Bhutan ranks 65th and Montenegro ranks 66th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) with 123 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.