Chile vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled
Chile
-2.26 million current US$
in 2004
Namibia
-2.13 million current US$
in 2010
Chile rank
115th
Namibia rank
114th
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Chile
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports -2.13 million current US$ against -2.26 million current US$ in Chile, a difference of 130,000 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Namibia ahead.
Chile ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 114th of 121 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 526,667 current US$ | 846,667 current US$ | 320,000 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2000s | -604,000 current US$ | 49,000 current US$ | 653,000 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled, Chile or Namibia?
- Namibia, at -2.13 million current US$ against -2.26 million current US$ in Chile as of 2010.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled between Chile and Namibia?
- 130,000 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2004.
- How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled?
- Chile ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 114th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) with 123 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.