Chile vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled
Chile
-2.26 million current US$
in 2004
Zambia
-2.80 million current US$
in 2023
Chile rank
115th
Zambia rank
116th
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Chile
- Zambia
How they compare
Chile currently reports -2.26 million current US$ against -2.80 million current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 538,490 current US$.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 116th of 121 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 526,667 current US$ | 2.82 million current US$ | 2.30 million current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | -604,000 current US$ | 2.39 million current US$ | 2.99 million current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled, Chile or Zambia?
- Chile, at -2.26 million current US$ against -2.80 million current US$ in Zambia as of 2004.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled between Chile and Zambia?
- 538,490 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zambia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2004.
- How do Chile and Zambia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled?
- Chile ranks 115th and Zambia ranks 116th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) with 123 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.