Kiribati vs Mexico: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled
Kiribati
515,180 current US$
in 2023
Mexico
536,380 current US$
in 2022
Kiribati rank
61st
Mexico rank
59th
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Kiribati
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 536,380 current US$ against 515,180 current US$ in Kiribati, a difference of 21,200 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Kiribati ahead.
Kiribati ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 59th of 121 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 539,938 current US$ | 1.41 million current US$ | 865,862 current US$ | Mexico |
| 2020s | 1.02 million current US$ | 875,377 current US$ | 149,370 current US$ | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled, Kiribati or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 536,380 current US$ against 515,180 current US$ in Kiribati as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled between Kiribati and Mexico?
- 21,200 current US$, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Mexico?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2022.
- How do Kiribati and Mexico rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled?
- Kiribati ranks 61st and Mexico ranks 59th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) with 123 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.