Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled

Kyrgyzstan
5.79 million current US$
in 2023
Zimbabwe
5.70 million current US$
in 2023
Kyrgyzstan rank
30th
Zimbabwe rank
31st

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Zimbabwe
-20.0M-10.0M010.0M198320032023

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 5.79 million current US$ against 5.70 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 84,630 current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 743,333 current US$ -1.02 million current US$ 1.76 million current US$ Kyrgyzstan
2000s 1.07 million current US$ 705,833 current US$ 367,500 current US$ Kyrgyzstan
2010s 6.50 million current US$ -5.17 million current US$ 11.68 million current US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 3.91 million current US$ 4.56 million current US$ 646,932 current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled, Kyrgyzstan or Zimbabwe?
Kyrgyzstan, at 5.79 million current US$ against 5.70 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled between Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
84,630 current US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe?
20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 30th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-gaps-filled/kyrgyz-republic/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-gaps-filled/kyrgyz-republic/zimbabwe/">Kyrgyzstan vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 6,076 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) with 123 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.