Montenegro vs Türkiye: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Montenegro
- Türkiye
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 102,240 current US$ against 36,870 current US$ in Türkiye, a difference of 65,370 current US$.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 2.8 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 66th and Türkiye ranks 69th of 121 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.52 million current US$ | -1.78 million current US$ | 3.30 million current US$ | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 568,980 current US$ | 1.43 million current US$ | 860,302 current US$ | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled, Montenegro or Türkiye?
- Montenegro, at 102,240 current US$ against 36,870 current US$ in Türkiye as of 2022.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled between Montenegro and Türkiye?
- 65,370 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Türkiye?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
- How do Montenegro and Türkiye rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), gaps filled?
- Montenegro ranks 66th and Türkiye ranks 69th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) with 123 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.