Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Pakistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per capita

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
0.0846 current US$ per person
in 2023
Pakistan
0.1019 current US$ per person
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
55th
Pakistan rank
52nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per capita over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Pakistan
00.10.20.30.4198020012023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.1019 current US$ per person against 0.0846 current US$ per person in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.0173 current US$ per person.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Pakistan ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 55th and Pakistan ranks 52nd of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Pakistan Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0787 current US$ per person 0.1095 current US$ per person 0.0309 current US$ per person Pakistan
1990s 0.0293 current US$ per person 0.0331 current US$ per person 0.0038 current US$ per person Pakistan
2000s 0.0691 current US$ per person 0.04 current US$ per person 0.0291 current US$ per person Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 0.0873 current US$ per person 0.0491 current US$ per person 0.0382 current US$ per person Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 0.1169 current US$ per person 0.1308 current US$ per person 0.0139 current US$ per person Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per capita, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 0.1019 current US$ per person against 0.0846 current US$ per person in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per capita between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Pakistan?
0.0173 current US$ per person, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Pakistan?
33 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Pakistan rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per capita?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 55th and Pakistan ranks 52nd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Pakistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-capita/congo-dem-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-capita/congo-dem-rep/pakistan/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Pakistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,953 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.