Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
-31.61 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
-29.88 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
116th
Mauritius rank
115th

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Mauritius
-50005001.0k198420032023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -29.88 current US$ per square kilometre against -31.61 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 116th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 85.79 current US$ per square kilometre -237.68 current US$ per square kilometre 323.48 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 43.62 current US$ per square kilometre 225.51 current US$ per square kilometre 181.89 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 31.63 current US$ per square kilometre -210.27 current US$ per square kilometre 241.9 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 74.03 current US$ per square kilometre -29.88 current US$ per square kilometre 103.91 current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at -29.88 current US$ per square kilometre against -31.61 current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mauritius?
1.73 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mauritius?
24 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Mauritius rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 116th and Mauritius ranks 115th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/mauritius/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Mauritius: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.