Brazil vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Brazil
-0.5298 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
China
-0.8359 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
78th
China rank
81st

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Brazil
  • China
-2024198120022023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports -0.5298 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.8359 current US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.3061 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 78th and China ranks 81st of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and China in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil China Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0864 current US$ per square kilometre 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre China
1990s 0.0203 current US$ per square kilometre 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre China
2000s 0.1789 current US$ per square kilometre 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9705 current US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 0.7898 current US$ per square kilometre 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre China
2020s -0.5298 current US$ per square kilometre -1.08 current US$ per square kilometre 0.5524 current US$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Brazil or China?
Brazil, at -0.5298 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.8359 current US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2020.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Brazil and China?
0.3061 current US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
39 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2020.
How do Brazil and China rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Brazil ranks 78th and China ranks 81st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/brazil/china/">Brazil vs China: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.