Chile vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Chile
-3.04 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Namibia
-2.59 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Chile rank
98th
Namibia rank
97th

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Chile
  • Namibia
-3-2-101199520022010

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -2.59 current US$ per square kilometre against -3.04 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.45 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 97th of 121 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7083 current US$ per square kilometre 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3201 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s -0.8574 current US$ per square kilometre 0.0577 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9151 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Chile or Namibia?
Namibia, at -2.59 current US$ per square kilometre against -3.04 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2010.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Chile and Namibia?
0.45 current US$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Namibia?
7 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2004.
How do Chile and Namibia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Chile ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 97th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/namibia/">Chile vs Namibia: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.