China vs Congo: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

China
-0.8359 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
-0.8907 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
81st
Congo rank
83rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • China
  • Congo
-100102030198120022023

How they compare

China currently reports -0.8359 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.8907 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0548 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1984 it was China ahead.

China ranks 81st and Congo ranks 83rd of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Congo Difference Ahead
1980s 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre 2.2 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3651 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre -0.092 current US$ per square kilometre 1.79 current US$ per square kilometre China
2000s 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre 4.06 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s -1.44 current US$ per square kilometre 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre 2.75 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, China or Congo?
China, at -0.8359 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.8907 current US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between China and Congo?
0.0548 current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Congo?
35 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do China and Congo rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
China ranks 81st and Congo ranks 83rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Congo: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/congo-rep/">China vs Congo: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.