China vs Panama: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

China
-0.8359 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
-0.7017 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2016
China rank
81st
Panama rank
80th

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • China
  • Panama
-50050100198120022023

How they compare

Panama currently reports -0.7017 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.8359 current US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.1342 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Panama ahead.

China ranks 81st and Panama ranks 80th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Panama Difference Ahead
1980s 1.7 current US$ per square kilometre 41.05 current US$ per square kilometre 39.35 current US$ per square kilometre Panama
1990s 1.58 current US$ per square kilometre -15.54 current US$ per square kilometre 17.12 current US$ per square kilometre China
2000s 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre -3.59 current US$ per square kilometre 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 2.5 current US$ per square kilometre -9.93 current US$ per square kilometre 12.43 current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, China or Panama?
Panama, at -0.7017 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.8359 current US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2016.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between China and Panama?
0.1342 current US$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Panama?
33 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2016.
How do China and Panama rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
China ranks 81st and Panama ranks 80th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Panama: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/panama/">China vs Panama: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.