East Asia & Pacific vs Mozambique: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

East Asia & Pacific
0.3779 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
33.16 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
33rd
Mozambique rank
31st

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Mozambique
0102030197920012023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 33.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3779 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 32.78 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 87.7 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Mozambique ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 33rd and Mozambique ranks 31st of 45 groups.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Mozambique Difference Ahead
1980s 1.56 current US$ per square kilometre 5.24 current US$ per square kilometre 3.68 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 0.8878 current US$ per square kilometre 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre 0.7428 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 1.41 current US$ per square kilometre 7.17 current US$ per square kilometre 5.76 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 3.14 current US$ per square kilometre 9.1 current US$ per square kilometre 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 0.6504 current US$ per square kilometre 20.72 current US$ per square kilometre 20.07 current US$ per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, East Asia & Pacific or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 33.16 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.3779 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between East Asia & Pacific and Mozambique?
32.78 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Mozambique?
38 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Mozambique rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 33rd and Mozambique ranks 31st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Mozambique: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/mozambique/">East Asia & Pacific vs Mozambique: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.