Europe & Central Asia vs Pakistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Europe & Central Asia
0.5659 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
32.72 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
29th
Pakistan rank
32nd

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Pakistan
020406080197920012023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 32.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5659 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 32.15 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 57.8 times Europe & Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Pakistan ahead.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 32nd of 45 groups.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1980s 0.2643 current US$ per square kilometre 12.61 current US$ per square kilometre 12.34 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 0.2112 current US$ per square kilometre 5.98 current US$ per square kilometre 5.77 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0.7366 current US$ per square kilometre 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre 4.58 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 0.9529 current US$ per square kilometre 13.86 current US$ per square kilometre 12.91 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 0.7796 current US$ per square kilometre 41.12 current US$ per square kilometre 40.34 current US$ per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Europe & Central Asia or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 32.72 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.5659 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Europe & Central Asia and Pakistan?
32.15 current US$ per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Pakistan?
43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Pakistan rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 32nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Pakistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/pakistan/">Europe & Central Asia vs Pakistan: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.