Guinea-Bissau vs Low income: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Guinea-Bissau
185.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low income
16.82 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
12th
Low income rank
11th

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Low income
-50050100150200197920012023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 185.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.82 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income, a difference of 168.32 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 11.0 times Low income's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 12th and Low income ranks 11th of 121 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Low income Difference Ahead
1980s 30.49 current US$ per square kilometre 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre 25.67 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 12.53 current US$ per square kilometre 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre 9.8 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 56.31 current US$ per square kilometre 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre 50.85 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 34.17 current US$ per square kilometre 9.51 current US$ per square kilometre 24.67 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 74.43 current US$ per square kilometre 14.31 current US$ per square kilometre 60.12 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Guinea-Bissau or Low income?
Guinea-Bissau, at 185.14 current US$ per square kilometre against 16.82 current US$ per square kilometre in Low income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Guinea-Bissau and Low income?
168.32 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Low income?
30 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Low income rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 12th and Low income ranks 11th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Low income: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/low-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/low-income/">Guinea-Bissau vs Low income: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.