Guyana vs Late-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Guyana
13.36 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend
-0.6229 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Guyana rank
44th
Late-demographic dividend rank
43rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Guyana
  • Late-demographic dividend
05101520197920012023

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 13.36 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.6229 current US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 13.98 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guyana's figure about 21.5 times Late-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Guyana ahead.

Guyana ranks 44th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 43rd of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 4 and Late-demographic dividend in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Late-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1980s 5.18 current US$ per square kilometre 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre 3.72 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
1990s 0.9855 current US$ per square kilometre 0.6291 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3564 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
2000s 3.99 current US$ per square kilometre 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre 2.94 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana
2010s 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre 0.1947 current US$ per square kilometre Late-demographic dividend
2020s 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre -0.2294 current US$ per square kilometre 2.54 current US$ per square kilometre Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Guyana or Late-demographic dividend?
Guyana, at 13.36 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.6229 current US$ per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Guyana and Late-demographic dividend?
13.98 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Late-demographic dividend?
35 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2022.
How do Guyana and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Guyana ranks 44th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 43rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guyana vs Late-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/late-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guyana/late-demographic-dividend/">Guyana vs Late-demographic dividend: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.