Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Mauritania
10.65 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
14.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
45th
Zimbabwe rank
43rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Mauritania
  • Zimbabwe
-40-20020198220022023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 14.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.65 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 4.09 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9877 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.4599 current US$ per square kilometre 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre 1.8 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre -11.66 current US$ per square kilometre 13.81 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 5.21 current US$ per square kilometre 11.79 current US$ per square kilometre 6.58 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 14.74 current US$ per square kilometre against 10.65 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
4.09 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Mauritania ranks 45th and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zimbabwe/">Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.