Upper middle income vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square

Upper middle income
-0.2826 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
14.74 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Upper middle income rank
42nd
Zimbabwe rank
43rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square over time

  • Upper middle income
  • Zimbabwe
-40-20020197920012023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 14.74 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.2826 current US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income, a difference of 15.02 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 52.1 times Upper middle income's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Upper middle income ahead.

Upper middle income ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 45 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Upper middle income averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Upper middle income Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1980s 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.5435 current US$ per square kilometre 2.89 current US$ per square kilometre 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.5415 current US$ per square kilometre 2.26 current US$ per square kilometre 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre -11.66 current US$ per square kilometre 13.06 current US$ per square kilometre Upper middle income
2020s -0.3552 current US$ per square kilometre 11.79 current US$ per square kilometre 12.14 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square, Upper middle income or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 14.74 current US$ per square kilometre against -0.2826 current US$ per square kilometre in Upper middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square between Upper middle income and Zimbabwe?
15.02 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Upper middle income and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2023.
How do Upper middle income and Zimbabwe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per square?
Upper middle income ranks 42nd and Zimbabwe ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Upper middle income vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/upper-middle-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-square-kilometre/upper-middle-income/zimbabwe/">Upper middle income vs Zimbabwe: Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 5,908 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.