Cape Verde vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per unit of

Cape Verde
0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
0 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Cape Verde rank
17th
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
18th

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per unit of over time

  • Cape Verde
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
00.0020.0040.006197920012023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 26.3 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 17th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 18th of 119 countries.

Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0029 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0027 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde
1990s 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0015 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde
2000s 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde
2010s 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde
2020s 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per unit of, Cape Verde or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
Cape Verde, at 0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per unit of between Cape Verde and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
0.0009 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
37 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2022.
How do Cape Verde and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ifad (current us$), per unit of?
Cape Verde ranks 17th and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 18th of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cabo-verde/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ifad-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cabo-verde/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Cape Verde vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 5,874 data points, 1979–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.