Lebanon vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO

Lebanon
866,400 current US$
in 2023
Zambia
806,267 current US$
in 2023
Lebanon rank
51st
Zambia rank
53rd

Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO over time

  • Lebanon
  • Zambia
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M201220172023

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 866,400 current US$ against 806,267 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 60,133 current US$.

That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zambia ahead.

Lebanon ranks 51st and Zambia ranks 53rd of 135 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Zambia Difference Ahead
2010s 1.02 million current US$ 1.08 million current US$ 64,311 current US$ Zambia
2020s 1.19 million current US$ 1.18 million current US$ 16,234 current US$ Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ilo, Lebanon or Zambia?
Lebanon, at 866,400 current US$ against 806,267 current US$ in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ilo between Lebanon and Zambia?
60,133 current US$, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Zambia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Lebanon and Zambia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ilo?
Lebanon ranks 51st and Zambia ranks 53rd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lebanon vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ilo-current-us/lebanon/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ilo-current-us/lebanon/zambia/">Lebanon vs Zambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 2,077 data points, 2012–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies include the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.