Samoa vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO

Samoa
186,694 current US$
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
147,787 current US$
in 2023
Samoa rank
108th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
109th

Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO over time

  • Samoa
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M201220172023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 186,694 current US$ against 147,787 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 38,907 current US$.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Samoa ranks 108th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 109th of 135 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2010s 218,848 current US$ 397,313 current US$ 178,465 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 355,463 current US$ 539,916 current US$ 184,453 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, ilo, Samoa or Sao Tome and Principe?
Samoa, at 186,694 current US$ against 147,787 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, ilo between Samoa and Sao Tome and Principe?
38,907 current US$, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Sao Tome and Principe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Samoa and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, ilo?
Samoa ranks 108th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 109th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ilo-current-us/samoa/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-ilo-current-us/samoa/sao-tome-and-principe/">Samoa vs Sao Tome and Principe: Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
179 places, 2,077 data points, 2012–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies are the net disbursements of total official flows from the UN agencies. Total official flows are the sum of Official Development Assistance (ODA) or official aid and Other Official Flows (OOF) and represent the total disbursements by the official sector at large to the recipient country. Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. OOF are transactions by the official sector whose main objective is other than development-motivated, or, if development-motivated, whose grant element is below the 25 per cent threshold which would make them eligible to be recorded as ODA. The main classes of transactions included here are official export credits, official sector equity and portfolio investment, and debt reorganization undertaken by the official sector at nonconcessional terms (irrespective of the nature or the identity of the original creditor). UN agencies include the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), World Food Programme (WFP), International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), United Nations Development Programme(UNDP), United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), United Nations Regular Programme for Technical Assistance (UNTA), United Nations Peacebuilding Fund (UNPBF), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Labour Organization (ILO), United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). Data are in current U.S. dollars.