China vs Serbia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled

China
392,129 current US$
in 2022
Serbia
411,403 current US$
in 2022
China rank
127th
Serbia rank
124th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled over time

  • China
  • Serbia
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M197920002022

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 411,403 current US$ against 392,129 current US$ in China, a difference of 19,274 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1999 it was China ahead.

China ranks 127th and Serbia ranks 124th of 177 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s 15.54 million current US$ 1.39 million current US$ 14.15 million current US$ China
2000s 9.19 million current US$ 1.35 million current US$ 7.84 million current US$ China
2010s 3.08 million current US$ 602,236 current US$ 2.47 million current US$ China
2020s 221,854 current US$ 441,496 current US$ 219,643 current US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled, China or Serbia?
Serbia, at 411,403 current US$ against 392,129 current US$ in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled between China and Serbia?
19,274 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
24 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
How do China and Serbia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled?
China ranks 127th and Serbia ranks 124th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Serbia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-gaps-filled/china/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-gaps-filled/china/serbia/">China vs Serbia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled
Unit
current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 9,875 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) with 97 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.