Czechia vs Uruguay: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled
Czechia
100,000 current US$
in 2003
Uruguay
150,000 current US$
in 2017
Czechia rank
140th
Uruguay rank
139th
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled over time
- Czechia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 150,000 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Czechia, a difference of 50,000 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.5 times Czechia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 140th and Uruguay ranks 139th of 177 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 370,000 current US$ | 370,000 current US$ | 0 current US$ | — |
| 2000s | 135,000 current US$ | 240,000 current US$ | 105,000 current US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled, Czechia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 150,000 current US$ against 100,000 current US$ in Czechia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled between Czechia and Uruguay?
- 50,000 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2003.
- How do Czechia and Uruguay rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), gaps filled?
- Czechia ranks 140th and Uruguay ranks 139th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) with 97 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.