Aruba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Aruba
-1,556 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1999
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-884.62 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
Aruba rank
175th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
174th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Aruba
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
-2.0k-1.0k01.0k2.0k197419882003

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports -884.62 current US$ per square kilometre against -1,556 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 671.38 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Aruba ranks 175th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 174th of 175 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 444.44 current US$ per square kilometre 1,173 current US$ per square kilometre 728.63 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s -79.36 current US$ per square kilometre 978.02 current US$ per square kilometre 1,057 current US$ per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Aruba or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at -884.62 current US$ per square kilometre against -1,556 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2003.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Aruba and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
671.38 current US$ per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
9 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 1998.
How do Aruba and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Aruba ranks 175th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 174th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Aruba vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.