Bolivia vs India: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Bolivia
0.8717 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
India
0.7174 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Bolivia rank
145th
India rank
147th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Bolivia
  • India
02.557.51012.5196819952022

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 0.8717 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7174 current US$ per square kilometre in India, a difference of 0.1543 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.2 times India's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1968 it was India ahead.

Bolivia ranks 145th and India ranks 147th of 175 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia India Difference Ahead
1960s 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre 3.38 current US$ per square kilometre 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre India
1970s 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre India
1980s 6 current US$ per square kilometre 8.83 current US$ per square kilometre 2.84 current US$ per square kilometre India
1990s 2.83 current US$ per square kilometre 6.8 current US$ per square kilometre 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre India
2000s 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre 6.19 current US$ per square kilometre 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre India
2010s 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre 2.99 current US$ per square kilometre 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre India
2020s 0.6029 current US$ per square kilometre 0.9461 current US$ per square kilometre 0.3432 current US$ per square kilometre India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Bolivia or India?
Bolivia, at 0.8717 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.7174 current US$ per square kilometre in India as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Bolivia and India?
0.1543 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and India?
55 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2022.
How do Bolivia and India rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Bolivia ranks 145th and India ranks 147th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs India: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/india/">Bolivia vs India: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.