Botswana vs Ecuador: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Botswana
2.36 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Ecuador
2.58 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Botswana rank
127th
Ecuador rank
125th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Botswana
  • Ecuador
-1001020196819952022

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.22 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Ecuador ahead.

Botswana ranks 127th and Ecuador ranks 125th of 175 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre 6.74 current US$ per square kilometre 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre 9.14 current US$ per square kilometre 6.75 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre 14.25 current US$ per square kilometre 8.93 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 1.39 current US$ per square kilometre 6.93 current US$ per square kilometre 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 1.28 current US$ per square kilometre 3.4 current US$ per square kilometre 2.12 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.9445 current US$ per square kilometre 2.48 current US$ per square kilometre 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Botswana or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre against 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Botswana and Ecuador?
0.22 current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
55 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2022.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Botswana ranks 127th and Ecuador ranks 125th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.