Cape Verde vs Gambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Cape Verde
581.71 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Gambia
477.54 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Cape Verde rank
8th
Gambia rank
10th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Gambia
02505007501.0k196819952022

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 581.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 477.54 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 104.17 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.2 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 8th and Gambia ranks 10th of 175 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Gambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Gambia Difference Ahead
1970s 169.23 current US$ per square kilometre 119.17 current US$ per square kilometre 50.06 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 716.63 current US$ per square kilometre 343.08 current US$ per square kilometre 373.54 current US$ per square kilometre Cape Verde
1990s 239.45 current US$ per square kilometre 285.87 current US$ per square kilometre 46.42 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 157.07 current US$ per square kilometre 217 current US$ per square kilometre 59.92 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 159.25 current US$ per square kilometre 322.51 current US$ per square kilometre 163.26 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 362.61 current US$ per square kilometre 501.63 current US$ per square kilometre 139.02 current US$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Cape Verde or Gambia?
Cape Verde, at 581.71 current US$ per square kilometre against 477.54 current US$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Cape Verde and Gambia?
104.17 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Gambia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2022.
How do Cape Verde and Gambia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Cape Verde ranks 8th and Gambia ranks 10th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Gambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/gambia-the/">Cape Verde vs Gambia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.