Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guinea-Bissau: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.8151 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
Guinea-Bissau
160.11 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
21st
Guinea-Bissau rank
20th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Guinea-Bissau
050100150200197419982022

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 160.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8151 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 159.29 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 196.4 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 21st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 20th of 44 groups.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre 118.07 current US$ per square kilometre 115.09 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 1.87 current US$ per square kilometre 91 current US$ per square kilometre 89.13 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0.8151 current US$ per square kilometre 137.98 current US$ per square kilometre 137.16 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Central Europe and the Baltics or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 160.11 current US$ per square kilometre against 0.8151 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Central Europe and the Baltics and Guinea-Bissau?
159.29 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Guinea-Bissau?
21 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 21st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 20th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guinea-Bissau: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/guinea-bissau/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Guinea-Bissau: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.