Congo vs Tunisia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square

Congo
5.3 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Tunisia
4.89 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Congo rank
105th
Tunisia rank
108th

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square over time

  • Congo
  • Tunisia
0102030196819952022

How they compare

Congo currently reports 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.41 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Tunisia ahead.

Congo ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 108th of 175 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 3.29 current US$ per square kilometre 16.38 current US$ per square kilometre 13.09 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 4.14 current US$ per square kilometre 18.09 current US$ per square kilometre 13.95 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 7.42 current US$ per square kilometre 16.25 current US$ per square kilometre 8.84 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre 7.82 current US$ per square kilometre 5.69 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 4.55 current US$ per square kilometre 3.67 current US$ per square kilometre 0.8845 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre 4.85 current US$ per square kilometre 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre 3.33 current US$ per square kilometre 1.63 current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square, Congo or Tunisia?
Congo, at 5.3 current US$ per square kilometre against 4.89 current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2022.
What is the difference in net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square between Congo and Tunisia?
0.41 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tunisia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2022.
How do Congo and Tunisia rank globally for net official flows from un agencies, undp (current us$), per square?
Congo ranks 105th and Tunisia ranks 108th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Tunisia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/compare/net-official-flows-from-un-agencies-undp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tunisia/">Congo vs Tunisia: Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
222 places, 9,643 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.